Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Blood In The Streets















by Teresa Beau

I'm certain it's not the first time blood has run in the streets of Baghdad, but it's certainly the worst. Yesterday, over 100 people were killed in bombings and shootings in Iraq's capitol, including attacks on Baghdad University.

Four of those killed were United States soldiers assigned to the 4th Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division.

Prime Minister al-Maliki's response to the killings was to blame Sunnis, claiming the killings were reprisals for the brutally botched hanging of Sadam's brother-in-law, which resulted in his decapitation. Al-Malaki stated, "the remnants of the previous regime were dealt a severe blow that put an end to their fake dreams forever."

It is becoming more and more obvious that all dreams for a peaceful, free Iraq are "fake dreams." The United Nations has reported that 34,000 Iraqis were killed during 2006, and 2007 is starting out with more massacres.

Additionally, Iraqi cabinet ministers and legislators loyal to Shia death squad militia godfather, al-Sadr, were instructed to end their six-week boycott of the political process, giving al-Sadr the controlling voice in the Iraqi legislature.

In the midst of this ramped-up sectarian violence, and blood literally running through the streets of Baghdad, our President has ordered that approximately 21,000 American troops be added to those in-country, by extending the tours of those already in Iraq and by returning those recently cycled out of Iraq before their scheduled date. He is sending our young men and women, exhausted from the horrifying day to day carnage, without the promised respite, to Iraq to guard the "inmates in the asylum," in some futile attempt to keep them from slaughtering each other.

These words may sound harsh, but just what else would you call it at this point? There's no new strategy, no new ideas, no new diplomatic or political solutions. NOTHING! And NOTHING our troops can do will stop this 1,400 year old hatred and blood-letting. Pres. Bush is merely sending them to stand, and even die, in the blood-filled streets between two raging monsters determined to gnash each other to pieces. If Israel were killing Muslims at the rate Iraqis are killing each other, there would be a cry of outrage like no other from many of the very same people who are now doing or sponsoring the killing!

Of course, I agonize over the global consequences of a middle east that is enthralled in a sectarian war for the ages, but I wonder if there is anything at all our presence there can do to stop it. There are forces who can have an effect, and perhaps even broker peace in Iraq. They are Arab forces, such as Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, etc. Not only do they speak with the same voice as the Iraqi people, but they have much more credibility with those in Iraq than President Bush.

Our Congress must act, where our President is unwilling, and bring Iraq's neighbors to the table, and they must act to stop the escalation of our forces. In a country where the violence is already escalating, on a moment by moment basis,U.S. escalation will only add more of the blood of our young men and women to the blood flowing through the streets.

(Please take a moment to listen John Edwards' speech Silence is Betrayal in which he describes OUR responsibility to speak out, act, and make a difference: http://www.johnedwards.com/media/video/mlk-day-riverside-church/)

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Amazing Blog Teresa, Enthusiastic, heartwrenching, realistic and solution oriented all in one article.

Why this idea has never been hatched before is a question we all need to ask ourselves and this administration.

Our soldiers are trying their best to hold themselves up in a pit of quicksand, and they're weary at best. We need to bring them home from this (obvious to everyone except the Bush groupies), unwinnable civil war.

Paula J Countryman

Teri Beaugez said...

Thanks Paula! I was worried that I was a little too passionate about this subject to be objective, but perhaps objectivity isn't what's in this Country right now.

Anonymous said...

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Dec. 19, 2000

Posted by Paula J Countryman

Anonymous said...

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Dec. 19, 2000

Posted by: Paula J. Countryman

Teri Beaugez said...

Yeah, Bush is a real funny guy, isn't he?

Anonymous said...

Refusing to admit one's mistakes at the cost of thousands of human lives; Iraqi and Military, plus the destruction of an entire country, are serious crimes of a man with mental flaws who should never have been allowed to run our country for the first four years,
much less the second four. This boy/child still has another year and many more precious lives to end at his discretion.

Paula J Countryman

Anonymous said...

Refusing to admit one's mistakes at the cost of thousands of human lives; Iraqi and Military, plus the destruction of an entire country, are serious crimes of a man with mental flaws who should never have been allowed to run our country for the first four years,
much less the second four. This boy/child still has another year and many more precious lives to end at his discretion.

Paula J Countryman

Teri Beaugez said...

Paula:

Thank you for your comments and your patience. We have fixed the temporary problems with comment posting, which caused your comments to appear twice.

I, too, worry what will happen if Bush is left unchecked for the next year. Congress must step in and use its powers to the fullest extent to curtail this President.

It's been reported today that Prime Mininster al-Maliki is complaining that the problem is that the U.S. just hasn't given his forces the weapons they need! "I can strongly say that we could have been in a better situation right now regarding the equipment we have and the weapons we have, [a]nd if that would have happened, it would have greatly decreased the level of our losses and the losses of the Multi-National Forces as well."

When he says "our losses," he's clearly talking about Shia losses. Basically, my interpretatin is that he's saying if they'd had more and better weapons they could have completely wiped out the Sunni's by now. Despite the Sunni attacks on Shias earlier in the week, the Sunnis have suffered far greater losses due to the al-sadr's Shia death squads.

The Sunni are very much in the minority in Iraq, and I wonder how they will survive. Fellow Sunnis, Saudi Arabia, are reportedly very skeptical of Bush's plan.

Secretaries Rice and Gates have been making considerable efforts to calm Saudi Arabia, but they will not stand by and watch further slaughter of the Sunnis of Iraq. If Saudi Arabia intervenes, then I believe Iran will fully engage in Iraq, and what we have all feared will come to pass, the total colapse of all peace in the middle east.

Anonymous said...

The clock is ticking.